Moon (2009)
When considering the new science fiction movie Moon, one will immediately think of the Kubrick classic of 2001 A Space Odyssey, and for good reason. In Moon, an astronaut with only a computer to talk to, in this case Kevin Spacey as Gerty (think HAL without the evil). Sam Bell is our astronaut and his is a 3-year assignment to man Lunar Industries “mining bases” on the moon because in the not too distant future, the moon is the source of 70% of the world’s energy needs. His only contact with earth is taped feeds from his wife and daughter because apparently the live feed transmission towers have been broken for years and no one has fixed them. The movie begins with Sam’s last 2 weeks of his contract. I’ll leave the plot now because telling much more would be a spoiler in my opinion.
What makes this movie great is Sam Rockwell’s outstanding performance. He is literally the only character on the screen for the entire movie and that’s a huge burden to take on, but Rockwell makes it seem effortless.
Secondly, the Sci Fi is good. Realistic good. I’ve read articles in the past couple of years about mining the moon for resources, so it’s not comic book sci fi. It’s real. The computers and equipment are dirty and obviously worn. It’s dirty. Not the pristine white of 2001: A Space Odyssey, but what a real mining operation/ blue-collar job would be like.
Thirdly, the movie seems to roll along at pretty sedate pace, and before you realize it, you’re on the edge of your seat with tension. Much less “cerebral” than Kubrick’s movie which really leaves the viewer to make up his own mind about what the film is about, but probably too “cerebral” for mass audiences. Having said that, there is no ambiguity about the plot. There is a definite point being made here, and it doesn’t do it with a sledgehammer, but in a rather matter of fact way. And here’s some fun trivia: Duncan Jones, who directed Moon, is also David Bowie’s son. Sam Rockwell should be nominated for best actor for this movie. He deserves it!
‘4 out of 4 stars from this reviewer.
6 comments »
Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post or for TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
I gotta see this movie . . . as soon as it’s playing in a theater not named “The Manor.”
Comment by Daniel Roos — July 19, 2009 @ 6:54 pm
What’s your beef with the Manor? The seats? Or the “Art House” feel of the place?
Comment by DJShay — July 19, 2009 @ 7:23 pm
I think it’s the snootiness – did you know the Manor has never shown a single Jean-Claude Van Damme movie? Snobs!
Comment by Daniel Roos — July 19, 2009 @ 7:41 pm
Hmmm. I made need to rethink my choice of venues from now on
Bet they never showed a Chuck Norris movie either.
Comment by DJShay — July 20, 2009 @ 3:08 am
Playing at the Ballantyne Village theater… place is great… beer, sushi, comfortable seats…
Comment by Stone — July 20, 2009 @ 9:17 am
Ballantyne Village Theater I’d go to – that’s the theater I saw the Wrestler in. It was a really nice experience, except for the person who shattered a wine glass in the middle of the movie. You can keep the sushi and beer, bring on them cushy seats!
Comment by Daniel Roos — July 20, 2009 @ 6:50 pm